The release of Pope Francis’ new encyclical, Laudato Si’, has a lot of left-wing analysts over the moon. “Pope Francis vs. Vampire Capitalism!” blares Salon. “Eco-Feminist Theology?” asks The Huffington Post. The more grounded analysts at Politico, however, took a closer look at the encyclical and asked a different question: What does abortion have to do with climate change?
Buried in Pope Francis’ encyclical on climate change, released Thursday, was a bold exhortation that pro-life conservatives support action to stop global warming on moral grounds.
“[C]oncern for the protection of nature is also incompatible with the justification of abortion,” he wrote. “How can we genuinely teach the importance of concern for other vulnerable beings, however troublesome or inconvenient that may be, if we fail to protect a human embryo, even when its presence is uncomfortable and creates difficulties?”
Congratulations to Politico for noticing! But there’s more: Laudato Si’ also includes some very strong words condemning the practices of certain rich countries forcing poor ones to embrace population control as a condition of aid:
At times, developing countries face forms of international pressure which make economic assistance contingent on certain policies of “reproductive health”. Yet “while it is true that an unequal distribution of the population and of available resources creates obstacles to development and a sustainable use of the environment, it must nonetheless be recognized that demographic growth is fully compatible with an integral and shared development”. To blame population growth instead of extreme and selective consumerism on the part of some, is one way of refusing to face the issues.